Charity begins at home. Or does it?
Posted: Monday, November 23, 2009
by Derek Lee
Take care of home first and once that is in order then help those around you. You can’t look after others if you do not look after yourself. Is that true or is image more important? Especially in the world of politics.
For many years, billions of pounds, dollars, euros and other world currencies have been directed at helping third world countries, worn torn countries, and areas where natural disasters have occurred. Fully deserved and the right thing to do. Helping the less fortunate is important, especially in a time of crisis. This also gives a timely opportunity for our political leaders to get noticed in the media for their good work in the hope for those extra view votes.
This week, Cumbria in the Northwest of England, significant rain fall, as much as one months rain in 24 hours. Having spent a few rainy days their early this year, I can imagine how much that would be. Many areas have been devastated, Bridges collapsing, others near to collapse, High streets closed off due to the excessive amount of flooding, hundreds of people forced out of their homes, now without electricity, gas or telephones. Some literally cut off from the outside world. As soon as this occurred, the political band wagon rolled up to the area. Gordon Brown is seen talking to locals, assuring them help would be available, touring the area, telling how he would help.
Now, thinking charity begins at home, you would think that no effort would be spared to help these people during their time of crisis. What help is received? A pledge of one million pounds to a “disaster relief fund", and little else. Not forgetting the number of photo opportunities taken.
It would seem that as this does would probably not get worldwide media coverage, then only the least amount of assistance they can get away with is given.
If this was news worthy of more attention I am sure that more effort would be made to help, because it looks better. It seems that local problems is a vote winning exercise, whereas drawing attention to other plights around the world is better for political image.
Why are politicians always so willing to throw money and resources to areas around the world but when it comes to the people they are supposed to be serving, they come a poor second?
This Article has been viewed 145 times. (Not updated in real-time.)
Top-level comments on this article: (1 total)Hi Derek. Politicians are politicians, they will do anything to maximize their chances of getting that vote. The taxpayers money is what they are giving away internationally but how much for domestic assistance? remain baffling. Well-written article. Stay Well. ~Nenita~Thank you for the comment...I remain baffled.
We want your comments! If you can read this, you don't have javascript enabled, so you can't use this comment system. Please enable javascript.